Yes, a private limited company should check DPT-3 applicability if it has deposits, loans or outstanding receipts that fall within reporting requirements.

An OPC should also check DPT-3 applicability if it has reportable outstanding loans or receipts.

Section 8 companies are companies under the Companies Act, so DPT-3 applicability should be reviewed where there are reportable balances.

Government companies are generally treated differently under the DPT-3 filing rule, so applicability must be checked based on the entity type.

Yes, if it has outstanding receipts or loans in its books, DPT-3 applicability should not be ignored merely because business activity is low.

The annual DPT-3 filing is generally due on or before 30 June every year for information as on 31 March.

It reports the company’s position and relevant outstanding balances as on 31 March of the financial year.

No. Start early because classification, auditor certificate and MCA portal issues can delay filing.

Late filing may be possible with additional fees and penalty exposure, depending on delay and MCA rules.

The historical one-time return was introduced for past outstanding receipts. Current routine compliance generally focuses on annual DPT-3 reporting.

Balance sheet extracts, loan ledgers, deposit schedules, confirmations, auditor certificate if applicable, DSC and company details are usually required.

Yes, financial statement data and balance sheet schedules are important for verifying outstanding amounts.

They are helpful and may be requested to support classification and outstanding balance verification.

Yes, the form is filed electronically and requires digital signature by the authorised signatory.

Company records and authorisation should support the filing. Whether a specific resolution is needed depends on internal governance and filing practice.

Director loans may need reporting depending on facts and classification. They should be reviewed carefully before filing.

Unsecured loans are commonly reviewed for DPT-3 reporting, especially if outstanding at year-end.

Customer advances may require classification review under deposit rules, depending on purpose, ageing and terms.

Inter-corporate loans may need to be included in DPT-3 particulars if outstanding and reportable.

Yes. Wrong classification may create mismatch with books, audit records and ROC filings, and can invite questions later.

Auditor certificate may be required depending on the purpose and contents of the filing. CompanyJi checks this before final filing.

The figures should be reconciled with company books and verified through accounts/audit records before submission.

Using unsupported figures is risky. It is better to reconcile with the final or near-final accounts and auditor workings.

Yes, we can coordinate required details with your auditor or help prepare a clean working file for auditor review.

Start with provisional ledgers, but final filing should be based on properly reviewed figures to reduce mismatch risk.

Non-filing can lead to additional fees, penalty exposure and poor compliance record for the company and officers.

Yes, MCA additional fees may apply depending on the delay.

If a mistake is discovered, correction options should be reviewed based on MCA form status and professional advice.

Yes, ROC or auditors may examine inconsistencies between DPT-3, financial statements and other ROC filings.

Review ledgers early, classify balances properly and maintain supporting workings before filing the form.

Yes. We can help with applicability check, ledger review, document preparation, auditor coordination and MCA filing.

Share company name, CIN, financial year, loan/deposit details, balance sheet extracts and whether audit is completed.

Yes, urgent filing support may be possible if ledgers, DSC and auditor documents are ready.

Yes, you receive filing acknowledgement, SRN/challan and a copy of records for your compliance file.

Yes. CompanyJi can also support AOC-4, MGT-7/MGT-7A, ADT-1, DIR-3 KYC, accounting, audit and tax filings.